Much of the explanation of the assembler appears to be perfunctory at best, but the commentary really scares me - the "possibly" and "game data? Map?" - I didn't expect such conjecture from a LLM.The results were interesting to say the least.
This is interesting because it does at least give some kind of breakdown of the code, even if its 'explanation' of the assembler isn't much cop. What worries me is people assuming such output is wholly correct and accurate.I have to admit, I feel a bit dirty resorting to AI for this sort of thing. But I have to remember that this is a tool, that helps to focus my learning of assembler, and pursue further avenues of experimentation.
Statistics: Posted by IanJeffray — Mon Mar 24, 2025 1:05 pm